<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supervision Debt on Fabian G. Williams</title>
    <link>https://www.fabswill.com/tags/supervision-debt/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Supervision Debt on Fabian G. Williams</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.fabswill.com/tags/supervision-debt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Paying Down Supervision Debt: Why the Five Control Points That Decide Whether Your Agent Ships Have Nothing to Do With Your Model</title>
      <link>https://www.fabswill.com/blog/paying-down-supervision-debt-five-control-points/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.fabswill.com/blog/paying-down-supervision-debt-five-control-points/</guid>
      <description>By the end of this post you will know which of the five infrastructure control points your agent stack is shipping without, and you will have a concrete pattern for paying down the observability piece of that debt: a public, consumer-readable audit-trail receipt that satisfies both your security team and your finance team with the same document. Nate B Jones named the gap on May 20. The receipt was already in production.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>